The web 2.0 course has covered a range of tools that can be used as part of the learning process.
Challenging, frustrating , time consuming ...... enlightening and now time for reflection.
E learning
As was indicated in the course, the "e" represents engagement as well as examining emerging practices. Engagement of students in the learning process is vital but there is a need for a warning at this point. Engagement does not equate to learning. Students can be engaged in a task, they can be doing "busy work" without quality learning taking place. It is the role of the teacher, whether they are using traditional methods of delivery or utilising the tools presented in this course, to focus on quality teaching and learning. I was at a meeting during the week where a very relevant statement was made: poor pedagogy is still poor pedagogy even if it is uses e learning tools.
We need to be very careful to maintain quality teaching while at the same time embracing the new tools presented. When using the web 2.0 tools we, as the facilitators, must ensure that the focus is on improved outcomes and on high quality student learning. It is very easy to become carried away with the production of a product with very limited substance when it comes to the learning process.
As teachers we are fully aware that the student who is disengaged is not learning but the reverse can not always be said . The student who is engaged is only " learning" if the activity has been effectively designed to process information, to facilitate student thinking, to emphasise reasoning, to build from existing cognitive structures, to solve or explain complex problems etc. The focus must be on facilitating challenging and intellectually demanding learning for all our students and therefore the effective use of the web 2.0 tools depends upon quality pedagogy.
The constructivist approach to learning emphasises that the student is not a passive recipient of knowledge and that there is not a fixed body of information but rather students build knowledge and the teacher becomes a co-learner. Students are encouraged to accept more responsibility for their learning with an emphasis on deeper knowledge and complex understanding and this can occur with the appropriate use of e learning. This student centred approach is balanced with the demands set within syllabus documents and external assessments.
The concept of anywhere, anytime presented in the video clip in the last sessions (which would have been better placed in the first session!!) is worthy of further exploration. The use of wikis and blogs do give students the opportunity to collaborate "anywhere anytime". There is not a restriction on the exchanges that can occur through social learning communities- they can occur 24/7. Again a word of warning... learning can occur 24/7 but the involvement of the teacher or access to the teacher does not need to occur 24/7.
Learning 24/7 - not teaching 24/7
Blooms taxonomy modification
The modification of Bloom's taxonomy to reflect the use of e learning and the web 2.0 examined is of use. The higher order thinking skills can be reflected in activities that engage students through the use of web 2.0 tools. As with the traditional Bloom's taxonomy, activities can be differentiated to meet the range of learning needs within the one class. If Bloom's is used in conjunction with the multiple intelligences models effective learning gains can be made.
Course structure
I have found many aspects of this course both challenging and frustrating:
- The setup of pages with scrolling within scrolling was of concern. I do not understand why this course could not have been created using a programme similar to Dream Weaver that would have allowed movement between web pages. Such a set up would still have allowed the links to websites and the embedding of video clips.
- My digital footprint has grown and I do not think this is a good thing!!! As part of the course I have been required to register on a range of sites and now have many nick names, log ins and passwords. While I have used a table to record all the log ins, the process is not manageable in the long run.
- I found the instruction in some parts of the course or in some of the programmes very unclear. For those who have been raised with computers much of what is presented may be intuitive but for those who have not, frustration develops. In some of the early modules I required the assistance of those who were computer savvy. While I have no problem asking for help, I think that the course should have been able to be understood without the need for further instruction and assistance.
Posting on other blogs
As part of the course I have posted comments on the following blogs:
G Bellamy Module 7
http://gennypat.blogsopt.com/2010/05/module-7.html#comments
C Azar Module 5
http://cathscorna.blogspot.com/2010/04/sandpit-from-ohare-on-vimeo.html#comments
Conclusion
As a result of the course I have learnt about the opportunities that exist in web2.0 and am keen to adopt many of the tools to enhance the teaching and learning with which I am involved. I have already been using some of the tools such as Scootle, pod and video casts, but there are some tools that will not become part of the repetoire of strategies that I use... second life ...
I have followed a number of blogs with interest but I have found the staff room discusssion concerning the course of greater value and I am grateful to my colleagues for their encouragement.
In education we live in an era of change and if we fail to adapt we will be left behind. However, the essence of good teaching remains and it is this that I will keep centred as I continue to evaluate the worth of web 2 tools.